WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.276
Hello and welcome to No Effort November,

00:00:03.276 --> 00:00:08.889
a series&nbsp;of videos for the month of 
November where no effort is made.

00:00:08.889 --> 00:00:12.455
Have you heard of these newfangled compact cassettes?

00:00:12.455 --> 00:00:19.765
Everybody's got them these days and tons of new music is being released&nbsp;on these little things all the time!

00:00:19.765 --> 00:00:24.419
But what if all you've got is an 8-track player?

00:00:24.419 --> 00:00:30.081
Well, have&nbsp;no fear of being left behind because Kraco's got you covered with this.

00:00:30.081 --> 00:00:33.034
Just pop the tape you'd like&nbsp;to play into this thing,

00:00:33.034 --> 00:00:36.438
then shove it into your 8-track player and blammo!

00:00:36.438 --> 00:00:39.867
You're listening to&nbsp;the latest hits like one of the cool kids.

00:00:39.867 --> 00:00:46.813
I love a good adapter and this may be 
my very favorite&nbsp;one because it's delightfully clever.

00:00:46.813 --> 00:00:52.989
It uses one of the weirdest and arguably worst 
features&nbsp;of the 8-track cartridge format

00:00:52.989 --> 00:00:58.414
to create a surprisingly competent cassette player 
which&nbsp;passes the signals on the cassette tape

00:00:58.414 --> 00:01:04.016
directly into the playback heads of an 8-track player so&nbsp;you can listen to the cassette.

00:01:04.016 --> 00:01:06.803
I don't remember when I first learned about these things,

00:01:06.803 --> 00:01:13.036
but back&nbsp;in the day I was given an old Zenith console radio set with a record changer, AM/FM tuner,

00:01:13.036 --> 00:01:15.440
and of&nbsp;course an 8-track player.

00:01:15.440 --> 00:01:22.448
And probably while perusing eBay for 8-track-related nonsense to&nbsp;play in that thing, I found one of these for sale.

00:01:22.448 --> 00:01:26.815
This is not the one I had back then - it broke and&nbsp;I threw it away.

00:01:26.815 --> 00:01:28.967
But I've tracked down another one for this video.

00:01:28.967 --> 00:01:30.568
And this is that!

00:01:30.568 --> 00:01:36.994
To explain&nbsp;what's so clever about this, first 
we need to look at the 8-track cartridge and its design.

00:01:36.994 --> 00:01:41.426
The 8-track was the first 
majorly successful consumer tape cartridge.

00:01:41.426 --> 00:01:45.374
It was based on an&nbsp;endless loop cartridge format developed for radio,

00:01:45.374 --> 00:01:50.561
but for success in the consumer market, it was&nbsp;cost cut to oblivion.

00:01:50.561 --> 00:01:52.156
A design of Richard Krauss,

00:01:52.240 --> 00:01:59.520
the Stereo 8 cartridge hit the scene in 1964
and&nbsp;it used conventional 1/4 inch magnetic tape.

00:01:59.520 --> 00:02:03.809
But it split the fundamental elements 
of a&nbsp;magnetic tape transport

00:02:03.809 --> 00:02:08.109
between the playback device and the cartridge itself.

00:02:08.109 --> 00:02:13.671
See, magnetic&nbsp;tape is really just 
a thin plastic film covered in powdered rust.

00:02:13.671 --> 00:02:18.526
When you drag that rusty tape&nbsp;
past a tiny electromagnet called a tape head,

00:02:18.526 --> 00:02:24.113
you can store information 
on that tape by magnetizing&nbsp;the rust particles.

00:02:24.113 --> 00:02:29.645
A sound signal which is fed to the head modulates the strength of the magnetic&nbsp;field it produces.

00:02:29.645 --> 00:02:38.731
And since the tape is moving past as this happens, the powdered rust becomes&nbsp;magnetized in the same pattern as the original signal.

00:02:38.731 --> 00:02:44.044
In other words, a recording 
of that signal&nbsp;is now present on the tape.

00:02:44.044 --> 00:02:48.380
And when you move this newly magnetized tape past the head again,

00:02:48.380 --> 00:02:51.658
but&nbsp;this time without sending signals into the head,

00:02:51.658 --> 00:02:57.028
the varying magnetization on the tape will&nbsp;create an electrical signal inside the tape head

00:02:57.028 --> 00:03:02.675
which can be sent to an amplifier to recover the&nbsp;
original signal and thus the sound.

00:03:02.675 --> 00:03:05.975
That's the basics of recording audio onto magnetic tape.

00:03:05.975 --> 00:03:13.206
But to do it well, you need a mechanism which can smoothly pull the tape past the head at a&nbsp;very steady speed.

00:03:13.206 --> 00:03:16.629
That's accomplished with a capstan and pinch roller.

00:03:16.629 --> 00:03:21.823
The metal capstan is&nbsp;spun by a motor at a constant and precise RPM,

00:03:21.823 --> 00:03:26.723
and the rubber pinch roller jams itself up against&nbsp;the spinning capstan.

00:03:26.723 --> 00:03:32.858
Stick some tape between the two spinny bits, 
and it's going to be pulled along&nbsp;at a steady speed.

00:03:32.858 --> 00:03:38.929
If you give the capstan a bit of heft with the help of a flywheel, you&nbsp;can make this happen incredibly smoothly,

00:03:38.929 --> 00:03:42.480
which is good for keeping the audio&nbsp;
signals from sounding warbly and weird.

00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:47.067
In a reel-to-reel tape recorder, you have a supply&nbsp;reel of tape,

00:03:47.067 --> 00:03:50.525
the tape transport with the tape heads, capstan, and pinch roller,

00:03:50.525 --> 00:03:56.526
and then you have&nbsp;a take-up reel, which uh takes up the tape after it's gone through the transport.

00:03:56.526 --> 00:04:01.052
But this whole&nbsp;contraption is pretty bulky and inconvenient.

00:04:01.052 --> 00:04:09.807
Now, you could put the two reels into some sort of box&nbsp;and then create a tape transport which interacts with that box...

00:04:09.807 --> 00:04:11.844
which is what a cassette is.

00:04:11.844 --> 00:04:18.354
But&nbsp;those tape transports are somewhat mechanically intricate, which makes them fairly expensive&nbsp;to produce.

00:04:18.354 --> 00:04:22.329
I mean, you gotta have parts that move the pinch roller into the capstan,

00:04:22.329 --> 00:04:26.434
you gotta have some way to move the tape in both directions so you can rewind it...

00:04:26.434 --> 00:04:28.595
I mean, it's just a whole&nbsp;ordeal.

00:04:28.595 --> 00:04:31.267
The 8-track format, on the other hand,

00:04:31.267 --> 00:04:38.064
took everything out of the tape transport except&nbsp;for the spinning capstan and the playback heads.

00:04:38.064 --> 00:04:44.474
The pinch roller became part of the cartridge&nbsp;itself with the tape riding along its outer circumference.

00:04:44.474 --> 00:04:48.429
And with the help of this notch&nbsp;here and a little spring tension,

00:04:48.429 --> 00:04:55.902
the 8-track player simply jams the cartridge and thus the&nbsp;pinch roller right into the capstan inside the machine.

00:04:55.902 --> 00:05:01.478
Since the tape is now sandwiched between&nbsp;
the capstan and the pinch roller inside the cartridge,

00:05:01.478 --> 00:05:06.549
this simple arrangement was all that&nbsp;
was needed for nice and smooth tape movement.

00:05:06.549 --> 00:05:13.897
And to make it even simpler, 8-tracks contain&nbsp;
a tape loop rather than two separate reels of tape.

00:05:13.897 --> 00:05:18.743
Tape is pulled from the center of that loop,
travels up and over the top of the cartridge,

00:05:18.743 --> 00:05:23.929
then back down the pinch roller 
before finally ending&nbsp;up at the edge of the loop.

00:05:23.929 --> 00:05:29.213
This somewhat odd arrangement forces the tape to sort of slide past&nbsp;
itself,

00:05:29.213 --> 00:05:34.170
but since the tape is pulled out from the center of the loop where the diameter is smallest,

00:05:34.170 --> 00:05:37.335
the tape is naturally kept in tension.

00:05:37.335 --> 00:05:44.844
The... rather large catch is that this form of loop 
prevents&nbsp;the tape from being moved backwards.

00:05:44.844 --> 00:05:47.705
No rewinding is possible with an 8-track:

00:05:47.705 --> 00:05:51.531
you just have to&nbsp;keep going forward 
until you're back at the start of the loop.

00:05:51.531 --> 00:05:54.282
No rewinding is possible with an&nbsp;
8-track:

00:05:54.282 --> 00:05:57.885
you just have to keep going forward until you're back at the start of the loop.

00:05:57.885 --> 00:06:01.261
That's&nbsp;not the end of the world, 
though, thanks to the format's party trick

00:06:01.261 --> 00:06:04.842
(which also explains why&nbsp;it's called the 8-track).

00:06:04.842 --> 00:06:09.922
The tape holds eight parallel 
audio tracks recorded across its width.

00:06:09.922 --> 00:06:13.956
They're interleaved as four programs of stereo sound,

00:06:13.956 --> 00:06:19.369
and the 8-track player used a mechanism 
which&nbsp;would physically move the playback heads

00:06:19.369 --> 00:06:23.033
to realign them with each of the four programs.

00:06:23.033 --> 00:06:26.220
This&nbsp;extra complexity belied some of the cost savings,

00:06:26.220 --> 00:06:35.538
but it meant that a hypothetical album with 12&nbsp;songs on it would be recorded onto an 8-track as four loops with three songs each.

00:06:35.538 --> 00:06:40.129
And with&nbsp;a button on the 8-track player which lets you step through the four programs,

00:06:40.129 --> 00:06:44.731
you could&nbsp;kind of skip around and get to a specific song.

00:06:44.731 --> 00:06:47.320
[Music plays]

00:06:47.764 --> 00:06:51.050
[song playing abruptly changes]

00:06:55.240 --> 00:07:00.810
[another change - each change occurred mid-song]

00:07:00.810 --> 00:07:07.354
And while it was physically impossible for the tape to move backwards without the loop getting very badly undone,

00:07:07.354 --> 00:07:15.164
many&nbsp;players such as this offered a fast forward option to make queuing up a specific&nbsp;song at least a little bit easier.

00:07:15.513 --> 00:07:17.817
[very high-pitched squeaky fast music plays]

00:07:18.134 --> 00:07:24.140
And of course, 8-track players could 
also&nbsp;step to the next program automatically.

00:07:24.140 --> 00:07:29.322
This was accomplished with a piece of foil on the&nbsp;splice point of the tape loop.

00:07:29.322 --> 00:07:36.710
Electrical contacts inside the 8-track player&nbsp;were pressed against the tape and they had a modest voltage placed across them.

00:07:36.710 --> 00:07:39.678
When&nbsp;the foil splice bridged those two contacts,

00:07:39.678 --> 00:07:46.181
that voltage was fed to a small solenoid that&nbsp;pulls down on this lever which steps the heads to the next program

00:07:46.181 --> 00:07:49.549
with the help of this spinning&nbsp;cam thing.

00:07:49.549 --> 00:07:51.545
This was a pretty clever trick,

00:07:51.545 --> 00:08:00.436
but splitting up a loop of tape into four programs&nbsp;
with the exact same length made programming rather difficult.

00:08:00.436 --> 00:08:06.465
So albums released on 8-track&nbsp;would tend to have 
the songs in a different order than the LP release

00:08:06.465 --> 00:08:10.342
or they might have weirdly&nbsp;long gaps between certain songs.

00:08:10.342 --> 00:08:16.508
Or - much worse - they might 
actually split a track across&nbsp;two programs

00:08:16.508 --> 00:08:23.844
which leads to a small gap in the sound in the middle of a song in addition to&nbsp;some audible clicks and pops.

00:08:23.844 --> 00:08:25.588
Not ideal.

00:08:25.588 --> 00:08:28.466
However, the format was stupid simple.

00:08:28.466 --> 00:08:32.534
Just shove the thing&nbsp;in and it starts playing without a fuss.

00:08:32.534 --> 00:08:35.703
And for its time, they were quite robust.

00:08:35.703 --> 00:08:39.854
Tape doesn't&nbsp;care about vibrations like conventional records do.

00:08:39.854 --> 00:08:43.527
And that made tape formats a great choice&nbsp;for cars.

00:08:43.527 --> 00:08:47.275
In fact, that's where 8-tracks first became popular.

00:08:47.275 --> 00:08:51.949
These days, 8-tracks&nbsp;are generally not well appreciated.

00:08:51.949 --> 00:08:57.113
For one, many of them now have issues with 
degradation&nbsp;of the pinch roller or the foam pads

00:08:57.113 --> 00:08:59.626
which keep the tape pressed up against the heads.

00:08:59.626 --> 00:09:04.094
And so&nbsp;they often need repair - just ask Techmoan.

00:09:04.094 --> 00:09:06.931
And they were never made all that well.

00:09:06.931 --> 00:09:13.167
I tried&nbsp;to demonstrate how they handled albums which split tracks across the program change with this&nbsp;cartridge,

00:09:13.167 --> 00:09:17.430
but the moment the splice made its way 
through the pinch roller and capstan...

00:09:17.430 --> 00:09:19.354
the tape&nbsp;broke.

00:09:19.354 --> 00:09:22.382
It broke! Right on camera.

00:09:22.382 --> 00:09:28.684
Even if they weren't prone to these issues with their&nbsp;rather restrictive playback limitations,

00:09:28.720 --> 00:09:31.025
they're a little annoying to use.

00:09:31.025 --> 00:09:34.805
However, 8-tracks sound better than you might realize

00:09:34.805 --> 00:09:39.390
in large part because the tape 
travels at 3 and 3/4&nbsp;inches per second,

00:09:39.390 --> 00:09:42.774
twice the linear speed of a compact cassette.

00:09:42.774 --> 00:09:47.680
And that allows it to record higher&nbsp;
frequency sound signals, which increases fidelity.

00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:54.267
It's definitely not great by today's standards,&nbsp;
but it's not really all that bad.

00:09:54.267 --> 00:10:00.797
Here are a few examples - and I'll note that 
this is by no means&nbsp;a good 8-track player.

00:10:00.797 --> 00:10:04.466
It's pretty basic and it has that delightfully 1970s

00:10:04.466 --> 00:10:07.730
"we are really&nbsp;trying to make this look like a digital device with seven segment displays,

00:10:07.730 --> 00:10:11.754
but this is really&nbsp;a piece of plastic in front of 
four incandescent light bulbs" aesthetic.

00:10:11.754 --> 00:10:15.203
But hopefully it gives&nbsp;
you a sense of what the format was capable of.

00:10:17.234 --> 00:10:21.126
[STAR WARS]

00:10:23.729 --> 00:10:27.491
[a much quieter and more obscure part of the soundtrack]

00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:29.712
[Get Together by The Youngbloods]

00:10:29.712 --> 00:10:33.013
[ope, now it's some instrumental thing]

00:10:34.092 --> 00:10:37.726
[The chorus of Aretha Franklin's I Say A Little Prayer]

00:10:37.726 --> 00:10:41.824
[You Don't Have To Say You Love Me]

00:10:41.824 --> 00:10:44.618
[instrumental section of Get Together]

00:10:46.065 --> 00:10:51.436
[and now it's the Mills Brothers]

00:10:54.039 --> 00:11:02.020
[and now some quieter classical music 
which reveals quite a lot of tape hiss]

00:11:02.020 --> 00:11:08.670
Now, if you're wondering why there's so much&nbsp;noise, 
part of that is this 8- track player's kind of terrible preamp,

00:11:08.670 --> 00:11:13.146
but also the track width&nbsp;is identical to a compact cassette.

00:11:13.146 --> 00:11:20.268
And since eight tracks peaked before tape formulations got&nbsp;very good and noise reduction technologies like Dolby B took hold,

00:11:20.268 --> 00:11:23.474
they tend to have more tape&nbsp;noise than you'd want.

00:11:23.474 --> 00:11:27.648
Not exactly high fidelity, but far from terrible.

00:11:27.648 --> 00:11:32.399
Still, by the late 1970s,&nbsp;
the format was starting to fall out of fashion.

00:11:32.399 --> 00:11:38.001
For one, the cartridges were quite 
chonky and took&nbsp;up a good deal of space.

00:11:38.001 --> 00:11:42.557
The compact cassette was quite a lot smaller and thinner.

00:11:42.557 --> 00:11:47.546
And here's&nbsp;a fun twist: 
this is actually an older format than the 8-track.

00:11:47.546 --> 00:11:49.505
This came out in 1963

00:11:49.505 --> 00:11:52.066
and this came out in 1964.

00:11:52.066 --> 00:11:55.245
You might think it odd that the 8-track even happened then,

00:11:55.245 --> 00:12:02.765
but the compact cassette's very slow 1 and 7/8 inches per
second tape speed initially gave it quite poor&nbsp;fidelity

00:12:02.765 --> 00:12:05.333
which made it awful for music.

00:12:05.333 --> 00:12:10.475
At first, this was mainly sold as a format for dictation&nbsp;
machines and similar applications.

00:12:10.475 --> 00:12:16.417
But before long, with the benefit of innovations in tape&nbsp;
formulations and improved recording and playback heads,

00:12:16.417 --> 00:12:19.614
cassettes could sound just as good as an&nbsp;8-track

00:12:19.614 --> 00:12:24.170
and indeed much better once features like 
Dolby noise reduction became standard.

00:12:24.170 --> 00:12:27.858
And&nbsp;all without any of the 8-track's weirdness.

00:12:27.858 --> 00:12:35.793
But there were plenty of people out there who had,&nbsp;
say, a car with a perfectly good 8-track player in there.

00:12:35.793 --> 00:12:43.868
As new music releases on 8-tracks&nbsp;started to dwindle, those folks would be left behind unless they upgraded their radios.

00:12:43.868 --> 00:12:51.185
That&nbsp;was annoying, especially since the radio part still worked fine for traffic reports and Casey&nbsp;Kasem's Top 40.

00:12:51.185 --> 00:12:58.328
Rudolf Van Kreuningen simply would not stand for 
this reality and so he designed&nbsp;this thing.

00:12:58.328 --> 00:13:02.735
Now, I will note that this is not the first product which worked like this.

00:13:02.735 --> 00:13:09.430
Tom T.&nbsp;Tsuji patented a similar device in 1969, 
and there were several designs over the years.

00:13:09.430 --> 00:13:12.741
However, this&nbsp;one features plenty of refinements

00:13:12.741 --> 00:13:18.971
and its clever arrangement of parts makes it much less bulky than&nbsp;those other designs.

00:13:18.971 --> 00:13:21.566
Here's what's so clever about these things:

00:13:21.566 --> 00:13:25.456
Since 8-track players all have&nbsp;that spinning capstan,

00:13:25.456 --> 00:13:30.140
if you can transfer that rotational movement 
into a drivetrain of some&nbsp;kind,

00:13:30.140 --> 00:13:36.039
you could use the motor of an 8-track player 
to actually drive a cassette transport.

00:13:36.039 --> 00:13:38.452
And that's exactly what this does.

00:13:38.452 --> 00:13:44.553
What was a pinch roller in an actual 8-track 
became&nbsp;a drive wheel in this adapter.

00:13:44.553 --> 00:13:47.775
And with the help of some belts 
and simple mechanical linkages,

00:13:47.775 --> 00:13:53.646
it can use the motor inside an 
8-track player to run a simple cassette player.

00:13:53.646 --> 00:13:59.737
As luck would&nbsp;have it, the compact cassette and 
the 8-track cartridge have nearly identical widths.

00:13:59.737 --> 00:14:07.665
And&nbsp;with the cassette slotted in like this, the adapter is just a tiny bit longer than a standard&nbsp;8-track cartridge.

00:14:07.665 --> 00:14:15.336
When this control lever is slid over to the play position, 
this idler wheel&nbsp;is jammed against the drive wheel.

00:14:15.336 --> 00:14:19.897
A flat belt made of some kind of 
cloth or paper to give it a&nbsp;grippy texture

00:14:19.897 --> 00:14:24.970
transfers that movement over to the 
pinch roller of the cassette transport.

00:14:24.970 --> 00:14:28.481
That is&nbsp;a little strange.

00:14:28.481 --> 00:14:34.239
Ideally, it should be driving the capstan 
and the pinch roller should simply&nbsp;spin freely.

00:14:34.239 --> 00:14:37.129
This design is exactly backwards,

00:14:37.200 --> 00:14:42.960
probably because it wouldn't be possible to&nbsp;
spin the capstan fast enough if directly driven,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:42.960 --> 00:14:47.840
but the capstan does at least have a substantial&nbsp;
flywheel to dampen vibrations and speed,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:14:47.840 --> 00:14:50.175
so it works well enough.

00:14:50.175 --> 00:14:52.540
At least... when these were&nbsp;new.

00:14:52.540 --> 00:14:55.373
This one's playing pretty warbly these days,

00:14:55.373 --> 00:15:00.997
though it's clear it got lots of use 
based on&nbsp;the wear shown on the pinch roller and heads.

00:15:00.997 --> 00:15:03.777
Now, I was a little worried this would be the case.

00:15:03.777 --> 00:15:09.972
The&nbsp;original one I had had the same weird belt in it, 
and before long, it tore itself to shreds.

00:15:09.972 --> 00:15:14.638
I could never get it to work properly again, 
which is why I got rid of it.

00:15:14.638 --> 00:15:19.735
But through the&nbsp;magic of buying two of them, 
I was prepared for this eventuality.

00:15:19.735 --> 00:15:21.833
And this one's new in box!

00:15:21.833 --> 00:15:24.814
Look,&nbsp;it's perfect for use in home 8-track players,

00:15:24.814 --> 00:15:26.394
car 8-track players,

00:15:26.394 --> 00:15:28.405
and patent pending!

00:15:28.405 --> 00:15:33.627
This&nbsp;one is a later revision 
and production was moved from Japan to Korea.

00:15:33.627 --> 00:15:39.533
When I tried it out, it&nbsp;played fine for approximately two seconds and then started slowing down.

00:15:39.533 --> 00:15:41.681
And then came to a stop.

00:15:41.681 --> 00:15:45.020
[sigh]
Guess I gotta crack this one open, too, then.

00:15:45.020 --> 00:15:47.731
And inside here, I found a surprise.

00:15:47.731 --> 00:15:53.265
This revision&nbsp;uses a standard 
rubber belt rather than... whatever that is.

00:15:53.265 --> 00:15:59.797
The original belt had simply stretched&nbsp;
just a little too much over the last 40 years or so and gave up.

00:15:59.797 --> 00:16:05.643
But after a quick run through my&nbsp;
bag o' belts, I found one that mostly works.

00:16:05.643 --> 00:16:08.758
It's not right, but it'll do well enough for this&nbsp;video.

00:16:08.758 --> 00:16:12.095
And after buttoning it back together, I gave it a test run.

00:16:12.095 --> 00:16:15.758
Great news, this one&nbsp;isn't warbly at all!

00:16:15.758 --> 00:16:18.509
Some less great news,

00:16:18.560 --> 00:16:23.845
it's running a little too slow and it's really&nbsp;
not able to keep a steady speed.

00:16:23.845 --> 00:16:43.440
I can't quite figure out why as everything in here seems to&nbsp;
spin freely, but well, let's give it a listen.

00:16:43.440 --> 00:16:51.064
[various music samples, with surprisingly good quality!]

00:16:55.190 --> 00:16:59.288
[doin' some testing here]

00:17:06.874 --> 00:17:15.117
[a slow, poppy/jazzy theme reveals how the speed isn't quite steady, especially in the horns]

00:17:29.600 --> 00:17:36.758
[8-bit/electronic music again belies how the speed is drifting, but it sounds decent otherwise]

00:17:38.758 --> 00:17:45.801
[ooh it's particularly bad here]

00:17:46.960 --> 00:17:52.023
Aside from its issues with speed, 
I find it&nbsp;remarkable how well this works.

00:17:52.023 --> 00:17:54.510
It doesn't sound bad at all!

00:17:54.510 --> 00:18:01.481
Other than the high noise&nbsp;floor of this particular 8-track player, it sounds just as you would expect a cassette to.

00:18:01.481 --> 00:18:04.006
So, there's really nothing to complain about here!

00:18:04.006 --> 00:18:06.752
This is a very basic tape transport -

00:18:06.752 --> 00:18:11.722
it can&nbsp;only move the tape forward, which was common in some of the cheapest cassette players out there,

00:18:11.722 --> 00:18:15.458
but it does at least offer a fast forward option.

00:18:15.458 --> 00:18:23.237
Interestingly, the patent suggests a rewind option&nbsp;was in the cards, but that was apparently dropped before production.

00:18:23.237 --> 00:18:28.249
You could, of course, 
flip&nbsp;the tape over and select fast forward to rewind,

00:18:28.249 --> 00:18:32.481
which is what you'd have to do 
with a cheap car&nbsp;stereo anyway so, honestly,

00:18:32.481 --> 00:18:35.236
this is amazing for what it is.

00:18:35.236 --> 00:18:37.930
But here's the even amazinger part.

00:18:37.930 --> 00:18:44.093
You&nbsp;might have wondered how the heck it's getting the signals from the cassette tape into the 8-track player.

00:18:44.093 --> 00:18:46.464
If you've seen those cassette adapters before,

00:18:46.464 --> 00:18:52.643
you'll know that you can actually&nbsp;just run a sound signal through a second tape head acting as a transducer

00:18:52.643 --> 00:18:58.970
and then shove it into&nbsp;a cassette shell such that it'll point at the playback heads of a cassette player.

00:18:58.970 --> 00:19:05.167
The magnetic&nbsp;field produced by the transducer 
in the adapter will be coupled into the playback heads.

00:19:05.167 --> 00:19:10.232
That's&nbsp;essentially what's going on here, 
though the transducer is a little different.

00:19:10.232 --> 00:19:12.036
You'll see why&nbsp;shortly.

00:19:12.036 --> 00:19:13.778
But hold on.

00:19:13.778 --> 00:19:19.059
Those cassette adapters rely on 
the amplifier in your CD Walkman or whatever

00:19:19.059 --> 00:19:24.399
to&nbsp;produce the power required for coupling the signal 
into the cassette player's heads.

00:19:24.399 --> 00:19:30.720
There's no way&nbsp;an actual tape head detecting 
the tiny variations in flux on an actual tape

00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:34.340
can produce enough&nbsp;power for that coupling to work.

00:19:34.340 --> 00:19:36.166
And indeed,

00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:37.593
that wouldn't work.

00:19:37.593 --> 00:19:46.709
So, the adapter contains an&nbsp;amplifier which boosts the strength of the signal coming from the play head before sending it to the&nbsp;
transducer.

00:19:46.709 --> 00:19:50.717
While that amplifier could be powered by some sort of battery,

00:19:50.717 --> 00:19:55.604
you could instead&nbsp;get a little power 
from the circuit inside the 8-track player

00:19:55.604 --> 00:20:00.092
which detects the foil strip&nbsp;to advance it to the next program.

00:20:00.092 --> 00:20:03.948
That's why the adapter has these spring-loaded metal fingers.

00:20:03.948 --> 00:20:11.381
These will come into contact with the contacts inside the 8-track player and scavenge a tiny&nbsp;bit of current from them

00:20:11.381 --> 00:20:14.634
which is delivered to a small amplifier board.

00:20:14.634 --> 00:20:18.406
And that meant this&nbsp;thing could work without any batteries.

00:20:18.406 --> 00:20:20.600
I love this solution!

00:20:20.600 --> 00:20:28.405
Why bother with a battery when&nbsp;every 8-track player out there has a couple of electrical contacts that are always powered?

00:20:28.405 --> 00:20:32.151
So long as the amplifier circuit consumes a small enough amount of current

00:20:32.151 --> 00:20:38.652
that there's no risk of&nbsp;the step solenoid engaging 
the advance mechanism, you can just use that.

00:20:38.652 --> 00:20:42.235
And it's not like this&nbsp;introduced 
any risk to the 8-track mechanism:

00:20:42.235 --> 00:20:47.983
If somehow one of these feelers managed to short&nbsp;the contacts together when inserting the adapter,

00:20:47.983 --> 00:20:51.399
all that would happen is the advanced solenoid&nbsp;would fire.

00:20:51.399 --> 00:20:55.311
I suppose it's possible that if alignment went very wrong,

00:20:55.311 --> 00:21:00.540
these could keep&nbsp;those contacts bridged together and thus the solenoid would become locked on.

00:21:00.540 --> 00:21:05.448
But the way that&nbsp;these pivot away 
from each other makes that seem really unlikely.

00:21:05.448 --> 00:21:09.715
Now, something that I was hoping&nbsp;
the patent would answer, but sadly it didn't,

00:21:09.715 --> 00:21:14.338
was the range of voltages 
this thing's amplifier board&nbsp;can work with.

00:21:14.338 --> 00:21:21.269
I can't imagine every 8-track player design out there used the same voltage&nbsp;for the step solenoid circuit.

00:21:21.269 --> 00:21:26.687
For one thing, those in cars are definitely going to&nbsp;
have a DC voltage placed across them,

00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:32.880
but those in the home, as far as I know, might&nbsp;
have an AC voltage across those contacts.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:21:32.880 --> 00:21:39.280
As it turns out, this one does put DC voltage&nbsp;
across those contacts, 14 volts to be precise,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:21:39.280 --> 00:21:42.738
but I can't imagine that was certain to be the&nbsp;case.

00:21:42.738 --> 00:21:45.723
The amplifier board does have a few zener diodes on there

00:21:45.723 --> 00:21:51.334
which are probably clamping the&nbsp;voltage down for the little amp chip in there in&nbsp;addition to providing rectification.

00:21:51.334 --> 00:21:54.346
And with&nbsp;so many capacitors on that board,

00:21:54.346 --> 00:21:59.814
I think it's likely some of them are smoothing out an AC input&nbsp;
to prevent audible buzzing.

00:21:59.814 --> 00:22:05.668
So, I suspect this was designed to work 
with pretty much any power supply&nbsp;it found.

00:22:05.668 --> 00:22:11.756
And though I only have a sample size of two, so far it's worked in every 8-track player&nbsp;I've tried it with!

00:22:11.756 --> 00:22:19.911
Regardless, while there might be some 8-track players out there which won't&nbsp;be able to use this thing, I still love the idea.

00:22:19.911 --> 00:22:23.246
It's taking the weird decisions of the 8-track

00:22:23.246 --> 00:22:28.864
(placing the pinch roller inside the cartridge 
and using that foil strip to advance the&nbsp;program)

00:22:28.864 --> 00:22:31.580
and putting them to an entirely new use.

00:22:31.580 --> 00:22:38.333
A use which just so happens to make 
an 8-track&nbsp;player capable of playing an entirely different format!

00:22:38.333 --> 00:22:44.592
And in doing so making them useful 
even&nbsp;when 8-track tapes stopped getting made.

00:22:44.592 --> 00:22:48.424
Oh, and remember that thing I mentioned about the&nbsp;transducer?

00:22:48.424 --> 00:22:53.698
So this is in fact a stereo coupler 
and the cassette player has stereo heads.

00:22:53.698 --> 00:22:57.792
So it&nbsp;reproduces stereo sound from a cassette just fine.

00:22:57.792 --> 00:23:03.254
But because on an 8-track the two channels&nbsp;
of a stereo program are interleaved on the tape

00:23:03.254 --> 00:23:06.420
and the play head physically moves up and down,

00:23:06.420 --> 00:23:12.014
the coupler needs to produce 
a detectable signal over a pretty wide range.

00:23:12.014 --> 00:23:18.984
I suppose it didn't&nbsp;strictly need to - they could have simply told users to set the 8-track player to a specific&nbsp;program,

00:23:18.984 --> 00:23:23.412
but this adapter works 
pretty well regardless of which one is selected.

00:23:23.412 --> 00:23:30.238
Actually,&nbsp;I was surprised to discover 
stereo separation is perfect no matter which program you're on.

00:23:30.238 --> 00:23:35.012
I&nbsp;fully expected programs 
one and four to exhibit a little bleed through

00:23:35.012 --> 00:23:40.798
since either the left or&nbsp;right channel head is close to the border between the two channels on the transducer.

00:23:40.798 --> 00:23:41.912
But nope!

00:23:41.912 --> 00:23:47.399
The&nbsp;middle programs do seem to sound a little better, 
but as far as getting good stereo separation

00:23:47.399 --> 00:23:50.282
it&nbsp;doesn't seem to matter which one you pick.

00:23:50.282 --> 00:23:52.486
Lastly - you know I had to -

00:23:52.486 --> 00:23:59.484
I wanted to see what would&nbsp;happen if I put my 
Bluetooth cassette adapter into this 8-track adapter.

00:23:59.484 --> 00:24:04.925
I had to fight&nbsp;with it a little bit as this roller thing 
was triggering the adapter's auto stop mechanism,

00:24:04.925 --> 00:24:06.656
but&nbsp;once I got it to cooperate...

00:24:06.656 --> 00:24:08.822
[music plays] heck yes.

00:24:08.822 --> 00:24:11.244
This is a ridiculous signal chain:

00:24:11.244 --> 00:24:13.904
Bluetooth audio to a DAC&nbsp;in this thing,

00:24:13.904 --> 00:24:16.488
amplified and output to a cassette tape head

00:24:16.488 --> 00:24:19.076
and then coupled into a second cassette&nbsp;tape head

00:24:19.076 --> 00:24:21.986
after which it is amplified again in the adapter

00:24:21.986 --> 00:24:24.658
and sent through the 8-track adapter's&nbsp;transducer

00:24:24.658 --> 00:24:30.609
before finally getting into the 8-track player's heads 
where it's amplified again&nbsp;and sent out the line jacks.

00:24:30.609 --> 00:24:33.034
But hey, it works!

00:24:33.120 --> 00:24:38.400
And if you've got a classic car with an 8-track&nbsp;player 
which you want to keep completely stock,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:24:38.400 --> 00:24:44.737
this is a viable, if quite weird, 
way to give it&nbsp;Bluetooth audio.

00:24:44.737 --> 00:24:52.559
I did discover though that for whatever reason, the signal is attenuated quite a&nbsp;lot when the control lever is fully engaged.

00:24:52.559 --> 00:24:55.049
This happens with both of these adapters.

00:24:55.049 --> 00:25:01.341
I'm not&nbsp;sure if it's an alignment issue or what, 
but between that and the fiddliness of the auto stop,

00:25:01.341 --> 00:25:05.794
if I were to actually use this as a convoluted Bluetooth adapter,

00:25:05.794 --> 00:25:09.240
I would probably find or make&nbsp;something of just the right size

00:25:09.240 --> 00:25:14.073
which could be jammed in there to 
force the lever to stay in&nbsp;the middle position.

00:25:14.073 --> 00:25:21.995
And hey, using this cassette adapter it won't matter how warbly the belts in the&nbsp;cassette mechanism of the 8-track adapter are,

00:25:21.995 --> 00:25:23.803
so that's a plus.

00:25:23.803 --> 00:25:27.001
Heck, the belts could be broken&nbsp;and it would still work.

00:25:27.001 --> 00:25:32.375
Though, of course, uh there are more conventional 8-track&nbsp;adapter solutions out there,

00:25:32.375 --> 00:25:36.444
and realistically, you should just use one of those.

00:25:36.444 --> 00:25:41.700
But man, there's&nbsp;just something 
about this that tickles my brain like nothing else.

00:25:41.700 --> 00:25:44.446
It's just so clever!

00:25:44.446 --> 00:25:50.075
And even&nbsp;though there's really not much to it, 
it manages to work quite well.

00:25:50.075 --> 00:25:53.764
For your sake, I truly wish&nbsp;
these were working as they were new.

00:25:53.764 --> 00:25:56.179
It's a bummer that neither one of these is playing quite right,

00:25:56.179 --> 00:26:00.969
but I know they would have back 
in 1982 based on the one I had before.

00:26:00.969 --> 00:26:07.538
Oh, and I should note,&nbsp;specifically for cars, 
there were also 8-track adapters with an FM tuner.

00:26:07.538 --> 00:26:11.073
Plenty of cars&nbsp;with eight track players only had AM radios,

00:26:11.073 --> 00:26:14.816
but with one of those, you could bring your car&nbsp;into the future!

00:26:14.816 --> 00:26:17.447
At least... a bit.

00:26:18.272 --> 00:26:19.619
Oh, oops. Sorry.

00:26:20.825 --> 00:26:23.516
♫ inconsistently smooth jazz ♫

00:26:24.800 --> 00:26:27.604
Have no fear because Kraco's got you....

00:26:27.604 --> 00:26:28.464
Oh.

00:26:29.067 --> 00:26:30.032
farts!

00:26:30.032 --> 00:26:33.349
...with the tape riding along its outer circumference.

00:26:33.349 --> 00:26:34.866
I keep screwing this line&nbsp;up.

00:26:34.866 --> 00:26:38.499
...travels up and over the pinch roller and then across the top of -

00:26:39.578 --> 00:26:42.556
Oh, I didn't fact&nbsp;check that.

00:26:42.556 --> 00:26:43.766
Hold on.

00:26:43.766 --> 00:26:45.656
Yep, that's backwaaards.

00:26:45.656 --> 00:26:48.342
What was a pinch roller ind an&nbsp;actual 8-track....

00:26:50.278 --> 00:26:52.313
Did I say "ind an?"

00:26:52.313 --> 00:26:54.052
We'll restart. That'll fix it.

00:26:54.052 --> 00:26:56.681
...and then shove it into a cashette sell.

00:26:56.966 --> 00:26:59.223
[dissapointed, but humorously]

00:26:59.763 --> 00:27:02.458
Well, sometimes roonerspisms happen.

00:27:02.458 --> 00:27:07.579
...and if I put my Bluetooth 
cassette adapter into the 8-track&nbsp;adapter

00:27:07.579 --> 00:27:09.232
[plasticky struggling]

00:27:09.232 --> 00:27:09.959
it's not workin'

00:27:11.229 --> 00:27:16.180
ooh boy the end music is really making a rubber-band-like push and pull with the speed change.

00:27:16.180 --> 00:27:21.030
It's interesting how it's way more noticeable in some instruments than others.

00:27:21.030 --> 00:27:24.412
I guess you'd call that...

00:27:24.412 --> 00:27:27.379
wow factor.

